Stay informed with daily updates from official sources worldwide. Curated for tax professionals.
Aggregating from 50+ official sources across 150+ countries
Get VAT and indirect tax news delivered to your inbox twice a week.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bloomberg Tax · 23 days ago
On Feb. 2, 2026 the Philippine Court of Tax Appeals ruled that renewable‑energy developers registered with the Department of Energy may zero‑rate purchases and claim input VAT refunds on zero‑rated sales of fuel or power from renewable sources, provided they satisfy substantiation and invoicing requirements. The decision clarified that the Commissioner’s earlier denial was due to missing documentation.
Bloomberg Tax · 24 days ago
The UK First‑Tier Tax Tribunal issued a judgment on 26 January 2026 clarifying the eligibility of input VAT deductions in cases involving fraud. The tribunal upheld HMRC’s denial of deductions for payments to four payroll service providers, finding that the taxpayers knew the transactions were connected to VAT fraud. The decision reinforces that knowledge of fraud can lead to denial of input VAT recovery.
Global e-Invoicing Requirements Tracker
Cooper Parry · 24 days ago
The UK First Tier Tribunal ruled that payments under VPAG, PPRS and similar schemes are post‑supply price reductions, meaning the VAT originally paid was too high. The Upper Tribunal hearing is set for 9–11 February 2026, with a decision expected shortly after, potentially unlocking up to £2.5 billion in VAT reclaims for pharma and healthcare businesses. Companies can adjust VAT back up to four years by filing protective claims now.
International Tax Review · 25 days ago
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that Spain cannot impose a stricter “directly and exclusively” requirement on VAT exemptions for services supplied by independent groups of persons. The decision clarifies that services must be directly necessary for the exempt activity, but exclusivity is not required, allowing general services such as cleaning to qualify. The ruling also states that competition distortion must be assessed on a concrete basis, not presumed.