Stay informed with daily updates from official sources worldwide. Curated for tax professionals.
Aggregating from 50+ official sources across 150+ countries
Get VAT and indirect tax news delivered to your inbox twice a week.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
LinkedIn · 29 days ago
Brazil’s new dividend withholding tax (WHT) has been in force for nearly a month, but questions remain about its application. The December 16, 2025 Q&A confirms that dividends paid to foreign governments, sovereign funds and social‑security‑benefit managers are exempt, and that the exemption also covers entities wholly owned by exempt investors. However, in structures where a Brazilian entity is held by a foreign holding company only partially owned by exempt investors, the exemption may not apply, potentially subjecting dividends to full WHT.
Bloomberg Tax · 29 days ago
The European Court of Justice issued a preliminary ruling on Jan. 22, 2026, stating that the Spanish VAT exemption for services rendered by cost‑sharing groups to members at cost is not valid. The ruling interprets Council Directive 2006/112/EC as precluding such an exemption, as the services were deemed outsourced and not linked to tax‑exempt activities. The decision applies to services such as cleaning for healthcare and educational buildings.
Global e-Invoicing Requirements Tracker
NatLawReview · about 1 month ago
The UK Supreme Court confirmed that VAT incurred on adviser fees related to an exempt share sale is not recoverable, applying a strict two‑stage test that requires a direct and immediate link to the transaction. The ruling rejects the modified approach that allowed recovery based on intended use of proceeds and clarifies that VAT grouping does not alter the nature of a share sale. Businesses must conduct early VAT analysis for share disposals to account for irrecoverable adviser fees.
Proskauer · about 1 month ago
On 26 January 2026, the UK Supreme Court ruled that VAT incurred on adviser fees for an exempt share sale is not recoverable. The decision applies a strict two‑stage test, rejecting the modified approach that allowed recovery based on intended use of proceeds. The ruling closes the possibility of treating such costs as general overheads to fund taxable activities.