HMRC has reset UK VAT grouping rules, allowing overseas establishments to be treated as part of a UK VAT group and removing EU case law such as Skandia and Danske Bank. The new policy reduces cross‑border VAT friction and invites businesses to correct over‑declared VAT, while expanding HMRC’s discretion to deny grouping where it sees collection risk or distortive outcomes.

Greece will gradually enforce mandatory B2B e‑invoicing, starting 2 February 2026 for high‑revenue firms and 1 October 2026 for all other entities. The new rules cover all B2B transactions, sales to non‑EU entities (excluding retail) and public‑sector contracts, requiring use of the IAPR’s Timologio platform. Businesses should prepare early to comply with the new invoicing framework.

This article examines the constraints on cross‑border VAT grouping in Sweden, addressing both EU member states and non‑EU jurisdictions. It outlines the legal framework and practical implications for businesses operating across borders.

The Canada Revenue Agency has reversed its long‑standing position, declaring that trailing commissions paid by fund managers to dealers are taxable under GST/HST, effective July 1. Dealers and advisors may need to register for GST/HST if their taxable revenues exceed $30,000 over four consecutive quarters, and will have to adjust accounting systems to collect and remit the tax. The CRA will publish a formal technical interpretation in the coming weeks, clarifying the taxable status of trailing commissions and confirming that upfront commissions remain exempt.

The Czech Tax Agency clarified its VAT rules for real estate effective July 1, 2025. The guidance redefines key concepts, expands exemptions for completed immovable property, introduces a new substantial‑change definition requiring costs above 30% of the tax base, and adds new classifications for residential and social housing. These changes align Czech VAT with EU case law and modify when and how VAT is applied to real‑estate transactions.

The Danish National Tax Court confirmed that extraordinary VAT reassessment is permissible when gross negligence is proven. In a case involving a Danish airline, the court upheld the tax authorities’ findings that the company used incorrect input VAT deduction percentages, failed mandatory year‑end adjustments, and understated its liability. The decision clarifies that repeated errors and prohibited energy‑tax deductions justify extraordinary reassessment.