On 21 January 2026 the Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued CTA Case No. 10505, clarifying that unutilized input VAT refunds on zero‑rated sales must be substantiated with an administrative refund claim and proof of entitlement. The decision confirms that the Internal Revenue Commissioner’s denial of a 2018 excess input VAT refund was based on the taxpayer’s failure to meet these requirements.
It clarified that such refunds require a substantiated administrative refund claim and proof of entitlement, and that the CIR’s denial was based on the taxpayer’s failure to meet these requirements.
The taxpayer sought a refund for excess input VAT related to the taxable year 2018.
The Court upheld the CIR’s denial, stating the taxpayer had not provided sufficient evidence to support the refund claim.
Get VAT and indirect tax news delivered to your inbox twice a week.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Bloomberg Tax · 3 days ago
The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) issued a decision on Jan. 23, 2026 (Case No. 10626) clarifying the treatment of unutilized input VAT refunds on zero‑rated export sales. The decision addresses the denial by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, which was based on a failure to substantiate the claim and invoices not covered by the approved Permit to Use Computerized Accounting System (PTUCAS).
Bloomberg Tax · 6 days ago
The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued a decision (CTA EB No. 2951) on Jan. 16, 2026 clarifying the treatment of unutilized input VAT refunds on zero‑rated export sales. The court partially granted a refund claim by a corporation engaged in export sales, after the Commissioner of Internal Revenue denied the request for lack of proof that service recipients were not doing business in the Philippines.
Manila Times · 9 days ago
The article discusses recent Supreme Court rulings and a BIR circular that simplify VAT zero‑rating and refund procedures for renewable energy developers in the Philippines. It explains that developers no longer need a DOE COE or an ERC COC, and that local suppliers no longer must file zero‑rating applications. The piece also outlines the conditions under which input VAT can be refunded and advises developers to maintain proper registration certificates.
Bloomberg Tax · 9 days ago
The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued a decision on Jan. 19, 2026 (Case No. 10607) clarifying the validity of assessments for alleged tax deficiencies. The ruling covers a range of taxes—including income tax, VAT, expanded withholding tax, and others—and finds that due process was not violated because the Final Decision on the Disputed Assessment (FDDA) stated the relevant facts. The decision provides guidance on how assessments are evaluated for due process compliance.
Bloomberg Tax · 10 days ago
The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued a decision on Jan. 16, 2026 in CTA Case No. 10570, ruling that yearbook printing is VAT‑exempt because yearbooks qualify as books under Philippine law. The ruling invalidated the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s assessments for deficiency income tax and VAT for the taxable year 2013, which had been based on BIR Ruling No. 421‑2013. The decision clarifies the validity of such assessments and the treatment of yearbook sales for VAT purposes.
Bloomberg Tax · 13 days ago
The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) issued a decision on Jan. 7 clarifying that a VAT deficiency assessment is void if the preliminary assessment notice (PAN) and formal letter of demand (FLD) lack the required annexes detailing the factual basis of the findings. The ruling applies to a domestic corporation’s assessment covering July 1 2013‑June 30 2014, underscoring the importance of proper documentation in BIR assessments.
