The French Administrative Court of Appeal of Paris issued Decision No. 25PA00785 on Feb. 4, 2026, clarifying that the ordinary law procedure for VAT refunds for taxable persons outside the EU does not apply when the taxpayer did not carry out transactions during the period. The UK company’s claim for an import VAT credit was partially denied by the Court of Montreuil and upheld by the Court of Appeal.

The Czech Customs Administration clarified on Feb. 6 that individuals from non‑EU countries can claim VAT refunds on goods purchased in the Czech Republic if they prove residence abroad and are not conducting business locally. Refunds are excluded for tobacco, alcohol, food, fuel and other specified goods, and sellers must provide two copies of the sales document with required notations.

On 27 January 2026 the Swedish Tax Court issued Advance Notice No. 62‑25/I, clarifying the VAT treatment of mobile housing modules leased to municipalities and private owners for student housing and nursing homes. The court held that leasing these modules does not constitute leasing real estate for VAT purposes, affecting input‑VAT deduction rights. The modules are assembled on site, mounted on foundations, equipped with utility ducts, and subject to time‑limited building permits.

The Uruguayan General Directorate of Taxation issued Consultation No. 6763 on Feb. 4, clarifying that bulldozers are not exempt from VAT under Resolution No. 305/979. The guidance confirms that bulldozers, classified as tractors, are not considered agricultural machinery for VAT exemption purposes, even when used exclusively in forestry activities.

The HMRC internal manual outlines the rules and procedures for calculating and managing default interest on VAT arrears. It covers legal powers, calculation methods, interest adjustments, and circumstances affecting default interest, providing guidance for HMRC staff and taxpayers.

Poland’s Ministry of Finance clarified that non‑resident businesses are subject to KSeF e‑invoicing only if they have a Polish fixed establishment (SMPD/FE) that participates in the specific supply. The rule, effective 1 February 2026, does not trigger on a Polish VAT registration alone and requires a full assessment of the fixed establishment’s involvement per transaction.

The Bahraini National Bureau for Revenue released updated guidance on VAT treatment of real‑estate lease incentives on 29 January 2026. The guide clarifies that rent reductions and rent‑free periods are exempt, while reimbursements for fit‑out contributions are taxable. It also provides examples of common lease incentives used by landlords.

The Bahrain Tax Agency released an updated VAT general guide in English on Jan. 28, 2026. The guide clarifies that outsourced services are taxable, VAT is due on full consideration when third‑party providers assign roles under direct supervision, and employee salaries remain outside VAT. These updates aim to provide clearer guidance for businesses operating in Bahrain.

This guidance explains that German businesses can apply to extend the deadline for filing VAT returns by one month. If the extension is used, a special advance payment equal to one‑eleventh of the previous year’s advance payments must be paid, and it is credited in the December advance payment calculation. The special payment can be corrected upon application if expected VAT changes due to a rate change.

HMRC released guidance on 28 January 2026 for developers of tax software that use generative AI. The guidance sets five mandatory principles—transparency, reliable source data, human oversight, security/GDPR compliance, and ethical AI with continuous auditing—to ensure AI outputs are trustworthy and legally grounded. Compliance requires clear disclosure, audit trails, limited data sources, and ongoing monitoring of models.

The Danish Customs and Tax Administration issued a Tax Council Binding Answer (No. SKM2026.54.SR) on Jan. 28, 2026, clarifying VAT deduction rules for management services provided by a Danish subsidiary of an EU-established AIF manager to its group‑affiliated parent. The ruling indicates that the taxpayer cannot be confirmed to be entitled to a full VAT deduction for costs used for both taxable domestic services and financial services delivered to its nonresident parent.

The Polish Ministry of Finance clarified the VAT rules for determining a fixed place of business (SMPD) for the National e-Invoice System (KSeF). The clarification, effective 1 February 2026, allows taxpayers with sales below 200 million PLN in 2024 to continue issuing electronic or paper invoices until 31 March 2026. It also outlines the threshold for the general requirement to issue structured invoices via KSeF.

The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) issued a decision on Jan. 23, 2026 (Case No. 10626) clarifying the treatment of unutilized input VAT refunds on zero‑rated export sales. The decision addresses the denial by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, which was based on a failure to substantiate the claim and invoices not covered by the approved Permit to Use Computerized Accounting System (PTUCAS).

The UK First‑Tier Tax Tribunal issued a judgment on Jan. 9 clarifying input VAT deduction and zero‑rating rules for second‑hand car transactions. The case involved a company that purchased high‑value used cars in Northern Ireland and sold them to customers in the Republic of Ireland. The Tribunal found that the taxpayer could not claim the input VAT deduction and zero‑rating as the Tax Agency had denied the claims.

This HMRC internal manual provides guidance on the reverse charge procedure, a measure designed to counter criminal attacks on UK VAT. It outlines the application and implementation of the reverse charge mechanism for relevant transactions.

The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued a decision (CTA EB No. 2951) on Jan. 16, 2026 clarifying the treatment of unutilized input VAT refunds on zero‑rated export sales. The court partially granted a refund claim by a corporation engaged in export sales, after the Commissioner of Internal Revenue denied the request for lack of proof that service recipients were not doing business in the Philippines.

The Bombay High Court ruled that a minimum three‑month gap must exist between a Section 73(2) show‑cause notice and the final order under Section 73(10) in GST proceedings. Orders passed earlier, such as the two‑and‑a‑half‑month order in the A.M. Marketplaces case, were quashed. The decision underscores procedural fairness and the need for adequate time for taxpayers to respond.

On 21 January 2026 the Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued CTA Case No. 10505, clarifying that unutilized input VAT refunds on zero‑rated sales must be substantiated with an administrative refund claim and proof of entitlement. The decision confirms that the Internal Revenue Commissioner’s denial of a 2018 excess input VAT refund was based on the taxpayer’s failure to meet these requirements.

The UK Supreme Court confirmed that VAT incurred on adviser fees related to an exempt share sale is not recoverable, applying a strict two‑stage test that requires a direct and immediate link to the transaction. The ruling rejects the modified approach that allowed recovery based on intended use of proceeds and clarifies that VAT grouping does not alter the nature of a share sale. Businesses must conduct early VAT analysis for share disposals to account for irrecoverable adviser fees.

The Philippine Court of Tax Appeals issued a decision on Jan. 19, 2026 (Case No. 10607) clarifying the validity of assessments for alleged tax deficiencies. The ruling covers a range of taxes—including income tax, VAT, expanded withholding tax, and others—and finds that due process was not violated because the Final Decision on the Disputed Assessment (FDDA) stated the relevant facts. The decision provides guidance on how assessments are evaluated for due process compliance.