The article discusses the CJEU Advocate General’s opinion in the Stellantis Portugal case, clarifying that transfer pricing adjustments agreed between parties may affect VAT taxable amounts, while unilateral tax authority adjustments do not. It distinguishes between separate services and contractual price adjustments, noting that a change in taxable amount does not constitute a separate supply of services. The final judgment is pending, expected before summer 2026, giving businesses time to assess implications.
The VATfaqs digest
Global VAT news, delivered Tuesday and Thursday. Free, curated from 50+ official sources, no spam.
No spam · Unsubscribe any time
International Tax Review · 1 day ago
Portugal’s new VAT grouping regime, effective from July 1 2026, introduces stricter eligibility criteria than other EU members, requiring a dominant entity to hold at least 75 % of share capital and 50 % of voting rights, and limiting participation to entities with a Portuguese head office that carry out deductible activities. The regime does not neutralise intra‑group supplies and may exclude financial and insurance groups with predominantly exempt activities.
Portugal Resident · 15 days ago
Portugal's Social Democratic Party has proposed a legislative change that would retroactively apply a 6% VAT rate to urban rehabilitation works in designated Urban Rehabilitation Areas, regardless of whether an approved Urban Rehabilitation Operation exists. The measure would override the current tax authority interpretation that requires an approved operation, potentially allowing construction companies to challenge past assessments and recover overpaid VAT. If passed, the 6% rate would apply to projects carried out since 2008.
Meridian Global Services · 19 days ago
The CJEU ruled that year‑end transfer‑pricing adjustments are not automatically considered VAT‑relevant unless they are directly linked to a specific supply. The decision clarifies that only adjustments that represent additional consideration for a particular taxable transaction trigger VAT adjustments, and businesses must assess the economic and contractual context of each adjustment to determine VAT exposure.
Bloomberg Tax · 22 days ago
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on 13 May 2026 that transfer‑pricing adjustments do not automatically trigger VAT unless a direct link exists between an identifiable supply and the payment received. The decision clarifies that such adjustments may still be subject to VAT if they qualify as price adjustments affecting the taxable amount, and it requires companies to perform a case‑by‑case assessment of their intragroup agreements and documentation.
Bloomberg Law · 23 days ago
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that a transfer pricing adjustment does not automatically trigger VAT unless a direct link exists between an identifiable supply and the payment received. The decision underscores the need for companies to assess each adjustment case‑by‑case, draft clear intragroup agreements, and maintain robust documentation to secure the intended VAT treatment.
LinkedIn · about 1 month ago
The CJEU ruled that profit margin adjustments in transfer pricing mechanisms do not automatically constitute consideration for a VATable service. The ruling clarifies that such adjustments may be treated as retroactive purchase price adjustments if not remuneration for a service, affecting the taxable amount of the original supply. This decision provides guidance for intra‑group arrangements and the need for a direct link between services and consideration.
Reach finance leaders who read VAT news.
Put your brand alongside trusted tax-tech intelligence across 150+ countries.
Key Takeaways
The adjustment can affect the VAT taxable amount.
They are not relevant for VAT purposes.
No, it does not.
Before summer 2026.
Primary source
Read the full article at Deloitte LuxembourgThis summary was published on VATfaqs.com on 20 January 2026. It relates to VAT developments in Portugal. The original source is Deloitte Luxembourg.
