The VATfaqs digest
Global VAT news, delivered Tuesday and Thursday. Free, curated from 50+ official sources, no spam.
No spam · Unsubscribe any time
The Bailiwick Express reader letter argues that Guernsey’s proposed 3% GST will not deliver the projected £55m revenue, instead yielding a net income of only about £12.3m after costs. It highlights one‑off implementation costs of £40.9m, ongoing annual costs of £30.7m, and a £30m increase in the States Superannuation Fund liability, concluding that the claimed £50m funding gap is negligible.
Italy’s mandatory B2B e‑invoicing via the SDI platform has exposed high first‑pass rejection rates driven by master‑data errors, highlighting the need for a tax engine to ensure real‑time compliance. The article quantifies savings of €37 per invoice and a drop in rejection rates to about 5% when a tax engine is used. It underscores that even mature markets like Italy still face significant data quality challenges that a tax engine can address.
Global e-Invoicing Requirements Tracker
The article explains how contract and toll manufacturing arrangements are treated under EU VAT law, highlighting the importance of economic reality in determining whether the supply is of goods or services. It outlines the reverse charge mechanism for toll manufacturing, the French four-part test, and the risk of creating a Fixed Establishment that triggers local VAT registration and reporting obligations.
The article provides a detailed checklist for UK VAT‑registered businesses to comply with the Making Tax Digital (MTD) programme, outlining digital record‑keeping, API submission, exemption criteria, and the penalty regime. It also highlights upcoming MTD requirements for Income Tax and offers guidance on software selection and consolidation.
The CJEU ruled that year‑end transfer‑pricing adjustments are not automatically considered VAT‑relevant unless they are directly linked to a specific supply. The decision clarifies that only adjustments that represent additional consideration for a particular taxable transaction trigger VAT adjustments, and businesses must assess the economic and contractual context of each adjustment to determine VAT exposure.
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on 13 May 2026 that transfer‑pricing adjustments do not automatically trigger VAT unless a direct link exists between an identifiable supply and the payment received. The decision clarifies that such adjustments may still be subject to VAT if they qualify as price adjustments affecting the taxable amount, and it requires companies to perform a case‑by‑case assessment of their intragroup agreements and documentation.
The BIR expanded the VAT exemption list for essential medicines in April 2026, increasing the number of exempt chronic‑condition drugs to 2,263 from 2,242 in December 2025. This move aims to reduce out‑of‑pocket healthcare costs and boost demand for locally produced generic medicines. The commentary notes potential benefits for domestic manufacturers but highlights ongoing challenges such as high out‑of‑pocket spending and supply‑chain constraints.
France's e-invoicing reform, effective 1 September 2026, requires all businesses with a French VAT footprint to use approved platforms for issuing and receiving electronic invoices and for transmitting transaction and payment data. The reform mandates structured invoice formats (UBL, CII, Factur-X) following EN 16931 with French extensions and adds four mandatory fields. SMEs and micro-enterprises will join the issuance and reporting obligations on 1 September 2027, while large enterprises must comply from 1 September 2026.
The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that a transfer pricing adjustment does not automatically trigger VAT unless a direct link exists between an identifiable supply and the payment received. The decision underscores the need for companies to assess each adjustment case‑by‑case, draft clear intragroup agreements, and maintain robust documentation to secure the intended VAT treatment.
The Supreme Court has upheld a 28% GST on online gaming, applying it retrospectively to curb unregulated wagering. The ruling targets real‑money games and aims to aid investigations into money laundering. The decision marks a significant shift in India's approach to digital gambling.
The Court of Cassation’s Order no. 17536/2025 clarifies that formal violations of VAT bookkeeping and invoice preservation do not automatically bar the right to deduction, provided substantive obligations are met. The ruling sets two exceptions—fraudulent intent or inability to prove substantive compliance—under which deduction is denied. It reinforces the principle of fiscal neutrality while maintaining sanctions for formal non‑compliance.
On 13 May 2024, the CJEU ruled that contractual price adjustments in intragroup transactions are not considered a supply of services for VAT purposes, meaning such adjustments fall outside the scope of VAT. The decision applies across the EU, including Portugal and Luxembourg, and underscores the need for case‑by‑case assessment of transfer pricing adjustments. The ruling does not change VAT rates or thresholds but clarifies the treatment of these adjustments.
The CJEU ruled that profit margin adjustments in transfer pricing mechanisms do not automatically constitute consideration for a VATable service. The ruling clarifies that such adjustments may be treated as retroactive purchase price adjustments if not remuneration for a service, affecting the taxable amount of the original supply. This decision provides guidance for intra‑group arrangements and the need for a direct link between services and consideration.
The French Supreme Court reaffirmed that contractual arrangements determine the recipient of services for VAT purposes in the American Express case. It ruled that issuer commissions are considered services supplied to a non‑EU recipient, allowing the French entity to recover VAT on those commissions. The decision reinforces the importance of economic substance and contractual reality in VAT treatment.
The article examines a case where an Italian company offers a €5,000 discount to a German customer in exchange for advertising services, treating the discount as a VAT swap under Article 11 of DPR 633/1972. It discusses whether the discount should be applied as a reduction on the supply invoice or issued as a separate credit note, and explains the reverse charge mechanism in Italy.
A buyer-side framework for tax, compliance and IT leaders preparing for global e-invoicing mandates that now bring penalties from day one. The five sequential steps are: map the mandate landscape (countries, transaction types, deadlines, urgency tiers), understand the compliance model behind each country (post-audit, decentralised/Peppol, real-time reporting, centralised platform, clearance), define technical requirements starting with ERP integration, formats and data residency, match vendors to your specific requirements through structured scoring rather than manual shortlisting, and validate the shortlist through peer intelligence on country-and-model-specific implementations. The article emphasises matching vendor architectural strengths to your country mix rather than chasing 'global coverage' claims.
Oman is rolling out a structured e-invoicing system called Fawtara, mandating XML-based invoices, Peppol network routing, and real‑time reporting. The phased rollout begins in August 2026 for large taxpayers and expands to all VAT‑registered businesses by August 2027. Key technical requirements include Oman‑specific PINT format, seller UUID, and accredited access points with MFA and ISO 27001.
The article examines the ownership of the SAF‑T compliance process across European organisations, outlining the roles of tax, finance, IT, and external advisers. It highlights the challenges of multi‑country mandates and proposes a three‑layer model—accountability, operational ownership, and execution—to streamline responsibilities. The piece also notes the expanding SAF‑T requirements, such as Bulgaria’s 2026 launch, and stresses the importance of clear ownership for accurate, timely filings.
Utah’s Senate Bill 162 expands the sales and use tax base to include streaming‑only digital content, subscriptions, and prewritten software, effective July 1 2026. The law clarifies that prewritten software is taxable regardless of delivery method and exempts transactions already subject to the Multi‑Channel Video or Audio Service Tax Act. Businesses must review product offerings, update use‑tax accruals, and adjust systems before the effective date.
Singapore’s GST InvoiceNow e‑invoicing mandate, effective November 2025, requires all GST‑registered businesses to transmit invoices through the national InvoiceNow network using structured XML standards such as SG Peppol BIS or PINT‑SG and to report invoice data to IRAS. The article outlines buyer and supplier responsibilities, handling of exceptions (PDF, cross‑border, inter‑company) and stresses the need for robust process controls and compliance confidence.